casino las vegasFor Their Own Good?DC Councilman Jack Evans’ bill would hand create a sports betting monopoly for lottery operator Intralot, despite the companyvegas x casino no deposit bonus proposing a high-hold sports betting model.The bill’s sponsor, Councilman Jack Evans, has said he wants to go with the monopoly because he believes it will bring in more money for the district.888 poker casino bonusEvans claims there is value in DC having first-mover advantage on its neighbors, but that means little to bettors when there is a competing market next door that can offervegas x casino no deposit bonus better odds.And it will apply to all gamblers, not just those who work in the industry.Virginia — like DC a casinos-less state — is also looking at legalizing sports betting, and so may soon have a golden opportunity to capture DC’s market.roulette machine casino

raging bull casino bonus codes august 2021

slot machine chances casinoA 2012 law was passed that allows the government to ban anyone from a casino for two years if they, or a close relative, make such a request, although that applies to anyone, not just casino workers, of course.Numbers Don’t LieGovernment officials in Macau aren’t the only ones to correlate problem gambling with working in a casino.That might not normally be a problem in a monopoly, until you consider Evans has expressly said he wants the DC market to compete with the casinos of West Virginia, Maryland, and others — as well as the black markets.captain jack s casinoDC Councilman Jack Evans’ bill would hand create a sports betting monopoly for lottery operator Intralot, despite the companyvegas x casino no deposit bonus proposing a high-hold sports betting model.The District of Columbia stands on the cusp of legal sports betting, with DC Council expected to pass a bill regulating the market on Tuesday.Macau’s leadership says the proof is in the numbers.when does tachi palace casino open

paragon casino resort buffet

captain jack casino codes 2021That same year, Occupational Medicine published a study of South Korean casino employees and found that they “might be at greater risk for gambling and other mental health problems,” because of their exposure to gambling.That’s something that should send alarm bells ringing in the ears of DC’s esteemed councilmembers.In 2009, researchers at the University of Waterloo studied casino workers in Ontario, Canada, and found that they are “fairly similar to casino employees elsewhere, in that Ontario casino employees gamble more frequently and exhibit more [problem gambling] than Ontario’s general population.That same year, Occupational Medicine published a study of South Korean casino employees and found that they “might be at greater risk for gambling and other mental health problems,” because of their exposure to gambling.It’s an unequal treatment and the government needs to explain better its reasoning,” legislator Si Ka Lon said during a hearing of the bill.st those directly involved with floor games.seneca niagara casino when will it open